A little known manuscript made at the zenith of Byzantine illuminated Lectionary production
3 Gospel Lectionary Illuminated manuscript on vellum. Byzantium, Constantinople, c. 1100.
Illuminated manuscript on vellum. Byzantium, Constantinople, c. 1100.355 x 268 mm. 313 leaves, complete. – Written space 240 x 184 mm, 24 lines of text in two columns.The main script is a regular ‘Perlschrift’. Ruling pattern with doubled horizontals in the upper and lower margins, and doubled verticals at the outer margin of the written block.The principal headings on the decorated pages are written in ‘epigraphic display script’ in gold. Many of the Alexandrian uncial passages are also written in gold. Ekphonetic notation to guide the delivery of the lections is supplied throughout by the original scribe. It takes the form of neumes in gold on the incipit pages. Illuminated headbands in the Menologion section, and numerous enlarged initials (some of them historiated), the decoration is constructed partly geometrically, and on the basis of highly stylised vegetal forms. Four evangelist portraits surrounded by richly decorated borders. – First miniature somewhat worn, the others in very good condition. – Binding of dark brown
leather on wooden boards by the Parisian firm Petit-Simier (19th century). Medallion-decorated edges with busts of haloed saints (three on the top and bottom edges, four on the fore-edge) within a vinescroll on a gilded ground.This type of edge decoration is highly unusual; there is no other comparable example known.
PROVENANCE:
1. Chrysanthos Notaras, Patriarch of Jerusalem (1707-31). 2. The Romanian scholar and collector of greek manuscripts Constantin Erbiceanu (1838-1913) acquired the manuscript in 1866 and may have sold it in Paris 1868. 3. Claudin, Parisian bookseller, his cat. of May 1877. 4. Henri Bordier (d. 1888) at Châtelaine-Aïre, near Geneva in Switzerland. 5. Baron Fernand de Schickler. 6. Société biblique protestante.The manuscript was presented to the Société biblique by Schickler before 1898 (Omont 1898, p. 390). 7. Now: Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
TEXT: fol. I-II: modern leaves, blank – fol. 1-2: reused 10th century bifolio, text of John Chrysostom – fol. 3-42v: Lections from John for Easter Sunday to Pentecost – fol. 42v: later note (18th century?) referring to liturgical use – fol. 43-108: Lections from Matthew – fol. 108v: blank – fol. 109-189v: Lections from Luke – fol. 188: Lections for vigils of first week of Lent – fol. 190: blank, with later notes – fol. 190v: blank – fol. 191: Lections from Mark – fol. 223v: Twelve Gospels of the Passion (last lection included only as a reference) – fol. 242: Gospels of the Hours of Good Friday – fol. 247: Liturgy of Good Friday – fol. 251: Orthros of Holy Saturday – fol. 251: Liturgy of Holy Saturday – fol. 253: Menologion – fol. 305: various lections according to the liturgical pattern of the Great Church (St Sophia) – fol. 307: Eleven Anastasis lections – fol. 310: end of text; later liturgical notes added (15th century?) – fol. 310v: blank – fol. 311- 312v: reused bifolio (text of Metaphrastian Menologion, in an 11th or 12th century hand) – fol. 313: reused pastedown (text of John Chrysostom, probably 14th century). The present manuscript is an example of a ‘complete’ Byzantine Gospel Lectionary. Lectionaries have lections for the entire movable year, starting with the opening of St John’s Gospel on Easter Sunday (synaxarion), followed by lections for the fixed calendar, starting on 1 September (menologion). The menologion here, by its choice of commemorations and the inclusion of certain rubrics, indicates Constantinople, and a close connection to the Great Church of St Sophia, the seat of the patriarch.The manuscript follows a pattern of lections in its menologion characteristic of a small sub-group of high quality illuminated lectionaries, identified by Dolezal (1996, pp. 25, 59-60) and Masuda (2003), which contain clear evidence that they were prepared for use of St Sophia. Among these manuscripts the closest affinity is with the calendars in Vatican,Vat. gr. 1156;Venice, S. Giorgio dei Greci, ms. 2; and Paris, BN, suppl. gr. 1096, the latter a dated manuscript of 1070 produced by a scribe of the school of the Chalkopratai in Constantinople (Spatharakis 1981, no. 160).There are some saints included in the lectionary who are neither found in the typicon nor in the synaxarion of Constantinople, such as Makarios of Jerusalem. On occasions the absentee is explained because he postdates the composition of the typikon and synaxarion (roughly mid-10th century in form), such as Eustathios, patriarch of Constantinople (1019-25).The related lectionaries share these commemorations. There can be no question, therefore, that the present lectionary was made for use in the same context as those three: either in St Sophia itself or in one of the surrounding churches that followed the liturgy of St Sophia. Further research on the calendar might clarify the use of all four manuscripts.
ILLUMINATION: fol. 3: St John; initial ‘E’ with a haloed figure – fol. 43: St Matthew; initial ‘E’ with Christ who addresses a small boy – fol. 109: St Luke; initial ‘T’ with John the Baptist and in the border Herodes and his wife Herodias – fol. 191: St Mark; Initial ‘T’ with Christ. The four opening pages are decorated with a large miniature, a headpiece, a richly decorated border, golden display script and a historiated initial.The subjects of the historiated initials are inspired by the beginnings of the texts.The evangelists are depicted writing in front of a gilded background and pieces of architecture. The miniatures are surrounded by richly decorated borders of blue trefoils of the type characteristic of so-called ‘Byzantine blossom’. The miniatures have been rendered with superlative craftsmanship, so the manuscript is without any doubt a major addition to our knowledge of Byzantine illumination.
LITERATURE: Bordier 1883; Omont 1898, Addenda, p. 390; Gregory, I, Leipzig, 1900-1909, p. 418; Soden 1902, I, p. 173; exh. cat. Paris 1958, p. 27, no. 42; Richard 21958, p. 188; Astruc 1959, pp. 85-86; Lazarev 1967, p. 253, no. 51; Voicu/D’Alisera 1981, pp. 467-468; Aland/Welte/Köster/ Junack 21994, p. 240, siglum l 351; Olivier 1995, p. 653. Omont 1929;Weitzmann 1954, pp. 358-373; Der Nersessian 1965, pp. 155-183; Velmans 1971; Spatharakis 1981; Weitzmann/ Galavaris 1990; Hutter 1993; Corrigan 1996, pp. 61- 93; Dolezal 1996, pp. 23-60; Rados 2000, pp. 113-137; Masuda/Ebihara 2003.